There are certain requirements that must be adhered to for a Binding Financial Agreement to be legally binding. If these requirements are not adhered to, the Agreement may not be upheld in the future if challenged. Here are some things to consider:
Did you receive adequate legal advice?
In the decision of Hoult & Hoult  FamCAFC 109, the parties entered into a Financial Agreement before they were married. The Judge ruled that the Agreement was not binding because the signed certificate of legal advice did not prove that the wife had received adequate advice, and the wife’s solicitor had not provided a written letter of advice, nor kept a written record of the advice which was given to the wife.
Did you disclose all your assets prior to entering the Agreement?
In Adame & Adame  FCCA 42, the Agreement was not upheld on the basis the husband failed to disclose his real estate in the United States and certain bank accounts. Unsurprisingly, this failure was also deemed to be a misrepresentation.
Has your Agreement been made pursuant to the right Family Law section?
The Husband and Wife in Sullivan & Sullivan  FamCA 752 entered into a section 90B Agreement four days after they married. A section 90B Agreement is for people who are contemplating marriage. Therefore, the Agreement should have been described as a section 90C Agreement, which is for parties to a marriage. The Court held that there was no Agreement.
If you are having doubts as to whether or not your Financial Agreement is binding, contact – 1800 662 535 the Brisbane family lawyers team at James Noble Law to book a 20-minute free consultation.
No-obligation 20-minute consultation. We have Qualified and Experienced Family Lawyers Brisbane at James Noble Law.